Posts Tagged ‘Ron Paul 2012’

Well, as you may have surmised, the Republidrone is a worker-bee for the Republican Neocon Establishment.  It’s the person who does whatever it takes to get others to vote for the Neocon, even when it’s absolutely not in the best interest of the drone, to do same.  It’s a person who will fight, tooth and nail, even engage in hand-to-hand combat, lock reasonable and well-reasoned individuals out of “his” party, in order to keep in the “ONE GUY” the RNC says is what the country or party, state or county, want them to support.  It’s a person who does not listen to the person he’s voting for, because he doesn’t need to.  The RNC, of course, has “his best interest in mind”, when it tells said drone to fight to WIN.

I came across such a Republidrone, yesterday.  He seemed like a nice enough guy, but Republidrones know how to get what they want.  They are well-mannered and well-indoctrinated to vote for and get others to vote for the Neocons when doing so is against their own best interests.

Republidrones are the worker-bees in the Republican party who do what they are told to do and only what they are told to do.  They get their news from the television newzz.  They are lulled to sleep by the MSM.   When they do go online to gather other information, their searches start and end with the emails sent to them via their local, city, and state Republican Party.  The Republidrone is not a thinker.  He’s a do-er.  And this is what makes this worker-bee the most dangerous.  Just as in real bees, the worker-bees are large in number, and they all do the same thing.  And, as you would find it difficult to engage a worker-bee guarding his own nest lest you be stung (repeatedly) by the many Republidrones, inside, you will find it next to impossible to engage one of these Neocons.  In general, we cannot make them think, as they now fight by instinct.  The bigwigs, as would the queen-bee, do their thinking for them

Yes, there are Demodrones, too (just as there are plenty of Democratic Neocons), but that would be another post.  Let’s just stick to the Republidrones, who have been following the RNC, especially this year.

Funny, and I mean by this, ironic; I received a call from a Republidrone yesterday, as it turned out, this was more evident the further along we got into the conversation.  This drone was in my area (my precinct, even) and wanted me, as a true conservative Republican precinct chair, to help him win his race for Texas State Legislature.  *yes;  he called me a true-conservative, and it’s funny, since no true conservative can vote for a Republican of this ilk.

So my initial thought was, let’s see if this guy will answer a few questions, and I asked whom he voted for in the recent primary race for president (I thought I asked which candidate he supported, but he argued I had said, “voted for”;  Republidrones love to argue, but they don’t like explaining their own actions.)  His response was, “of course, I voted for Romney”. I buzzed him. (You know, “Ahhhhk- wrong answer!”)
That was not the end of the conversation. As he’s only about five years younger than me, I asked him why the GOP/RNC/TRP/TCRP was so willing to vote for or install (by going so far as to commit fraud and assault others) yet another Neo-con (emphasis on con) as our president. We also had discussed how bad all Neocons are for the party. I asked if he would not want the party back to what it was when he and I were children. He used the “Reagan” buzzword.., with that tired line, “I most closely align myself with Reagan”, so I had to ask; “Reagan in 1980 or Reagan in 1984?” (He thought it was a trick-question.)  If you’re not aware of the difference, ask Dr. Ron Paul.  Reagan, in 1980, appeared to be a real libertarian conservative.  Fast-foward to 1984 (or, more likely, 1982), Reagan was a complete and utter Neocon.  I’d almost argue it was him who was the father of the Neocon movement in the USA.  Reagan, following his election, was the reason for Dr Paul leaving the Republican party.  And, I soon followed suit.

The whole conversation left me thinking, once again; as I cannot go with the long-time, too-many-termed-legislator who’s currently/still installed, and this guy didn’t really get it, that the Republican party used to BE the liberty party (or, the party of true libertarians) which means I cannot vote for or support him, I will most-likely abstain from that portion of the ballot, OR, I will go with whomever the Indy is, in that race. My vote will be one against the Neocons, either way.

WHY do these people, who actually believe they are running because they, “want to do some GOOD, for a change”, so quickly and completely align themselves with the Neocon-garbage?
WHY did this man, who really wants my help, vote for Romney?
Guess what? He never did answer this question.
And this is all I wanted from him; the WHY.

How can I spend my hours and my time or tell the people who count on my opinions when making their own decisions (as did I count on Ron Paul when it came to Ron Paul’s support of Reagan in 1980), give my support to someone who will not answer the only question I want answered?
Simply put; I cannot. And, I will not.

I cannot abide the Republidrone.  I cannot abide their master, the RNC, either.  Perhaps I should do, as I was advised by my County Chairwoman, Rosemary Edwards, and remove myself from the party.  Yes, I sent Rosemary an email, to explain why I cannot just jump in head-first to support Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan, for POTUS and VP, as I cannot support what they both are;  Neocons and higher-level Republidrones.  Her response was, essentially, if I don’t like it I should leave.

How that’s for, “Unity”?  What kind of party is this? (more…)


Finally, I am ready to sit down and discuss what happened 29 May, 2012, in the combo-primary in Texas.  It’s called a combo-primary as both Democrats and Republicans hold their primaries together (or combined) and ANYONE may show-up to vote in either primary.  I did vote early, the prior week, as I would not be working in my own precinct’s primary.

So, when prospective voters would walk in the door, our first question (after obtaining either voter-i.d. card or driver’s license) was, “With which party do you prefer to affiliate yourself?”  Approximately one-fifth of voters in this heavily neocon (Dem Neocon and Rep Neocon) area went with the Democratic slate/primary.  Fine.  No problem there.  Of course, we did not hand out paper-sample-ballots to these people prior to asking which ballot they wanted to vote-on, so they would see especially pertaining to the presidential primary, who their choices would be.  We also did NOT tell any of these voters that, if after they saw the choices, it was legal for them to step-out of the booth/poll and ask to change affiliation.  Doing this would have created more work for US and we (well, most of us working) did not want any extra work.  Regardless, each of the people wanting to go Dem went Dem.  Fine.

The other four-fifths of voters chose to go with the Republican slate (though the majority made it known they were NOT usual Republicans).  When asked for their party-affiliation, people rolled their eyes, sighed, and said ,”Republican”.  Some said (well, many said), “I am voting Republican, but only for THIS election”.  We heard, “I am voting the RON PAUL party”.  Some said things such as, “My father would slap me for this, but I am choosing the Republican party to vote for” and even one person had to say, “My mother will roll over in her grave, but I am voting Republican ONLY TODAY!”  This sort of thing happened ALL day long.

And, I know;  I have been after people to get the video EVIDENCE in all primaries and caucuses, as well as conventions, yet i video’d NOBODY.  Had I not been a judge, I probably would have done so, but as i was a judge, it was on ME to respect the privacy of ALL voters.  I did, however, make little notes (no names or other identifying info;  only check-marks) so I would have a pretty good idea of how these voters (remember, in a NEOCON neighborhood) were going.  For this reason (and I was THERE from six in the morning until well after the polls closed at seven in the evening!) I do believe that what I saw was probably the way Texas went.

As MY number was a conservative ESTIMATE of sixty-six percent going with RON PAUL, I have a feeling the real percentage for Paul was seventy-two percent.   I am SURE that the numbers for Paul v Mitt were completely FLIPPED, for none other than Flip, himself,  It is just NOT possible that Mitt took Texas and, particularly, Austin or Brazoria County (HIS OWN DISTRICT!) or San Antonio (Behar County). where Dr Paul worked for so LITTLE in their poorest hospital, Santa Rosa.

And there is zero chance that anyone in Texas or outside of Texas can convince me this vote-flipping was NOT DONE.  People think it’s a chore to flip the votes?  Do me and yourselves a favor;  check out the film, “Hacking Democracy” to see just how simple that IS.  Then come and tell ME that I am wrong in my estimation of the FRAUD and Vote-Stealing/ flipping in the (not so) great State of Texas, okay?  Of course,  the convention is still to come (end of week), but this bothers me more than all of the other cases of fraud and vote-stealing we know  transpired  throughout ALL of this primary season.

And, it’s all to ensure Obama  WINS this year’s election?  IS the GOP suicidal?  Given these smarmy and disgusting acts, I can only say:   They need to figure this out before the have NO party left!

***  Addendum:

When I talked, earlier and elsewhere, about other judges breaking the rules of the STATE ELECTION BOARD, here are a couple of examples.

I had my election-judge-training on the Saturday prior to our Tuesday vote and there were a lot of do’s and don’t’s we were given.

First of all:  the biggest DON’T was, NO CELL PHONES and NO Surfing the WEB as judges.  All cell- phones must be turned, OFF;  all day long, the other Democratic judge was on her phone, texting and talking, with whomever.  I was shocked as SHE was the person who put the sign up stating, “NO CELL PHONES;  TURN THEM OFF”, yet she felt as is it was fine for HER to break this rule?  Funny (not).  The Republican judge had just gotten an i-pad.  Supposedly, this was so she could get a book, online, and read it while waiting for something to do (there’s  a lot of hurry-up-and-wait in judgeship or clerkship).  Well, she could not figure out how to download a book to her new machine, so the same Dem judge (texting the entire day) showed her how to do it.  At one point, hours into the day, I went and asked the Rep judge what book she had gotten.  As it turned out, she had not gotten a book, but had spent all day on ABC_news site.  Who knows if she had been posting messages or comments or filling-in the ABC team?  I don’t.  And, I kind of want to know.

Another DON’T that had been stressed to ALL of us was this:  IF anyone comes in and wants to know if anyone else (Spouse, Neighbor, Child, for example) had yet voted, we were to politely tell them it was NOT possible for any of us to get the info and pass it on to them.  Well, at one point, I was asked to look-up a name (spouse of the voter, if I recall accurately), and I said;  “I am sorry, but I am not allowed, per Election RULES, to give you that info.”  This same Dem judge PUSHED me aside and did the search. She gave the info to the person requesting same.  She did this at least a handful of times throughout the day.

We were to NOT allow folk to loiter around the polls.  This should be a no-brainer, but as we were also in an OPEN school, it was a difficult one to stick to.  However, it surely WAS our job, collectively, to send people on their way as much as was possible.  No, each judge and even a couple of the clerks, sat and chatted with neighbors and others (friends and families), to the extent that voters (who were requesting help with using the machines) were IGNORED, because the noise-level was SO high!

It was a brouhaha.  It was, at times, a hullabaloo.  It was completely wrong, and I really don’t even know who I should complain to.  So, I am leaving it to any and all of you who read this: IDEAS?  Should I contact the local or State of Texas Election board to complain?  The precinct I worked was NOT in compliance with many rules, which were very fresh in MY mind, and it was more than irritating.  I bet, if I refresh my memory of other rules, these ladies found a way to BREAK them!  With something this important, should there not be a remedy?

Now, in the coming elections, I am my precinct’s chairwoman.  I hope I can get people working in MY precinct;  more willing to play by the rules, than those I had to work with in the precinct next to my own.  What a disappointing day!


^^^  Hopefully my final edit.  One other extremely strange happening occurred, about 2 hours from end of voting-day.   All voting-places were equipped with wi-fi (which they call, “mi-fi”) and, as you would think, the mi-fi needed to be turned “on” to transfer votes to the central office.  As we set-up, from six ’til just before seven, in the morning, the same Democratic judge was reminded,  “Turn on the mi-fi at seven!”, by our county tech guys, there to facilitate our primary, and scheduled to come back a few times during the day.

Well, it appears that nobody (whose responsibility it WAS to turn-on the mifi) bothered to get this done.  Yes, our tech guys drove by in their van and waved, at around noon.  We did not see them, again, until between 4:30 and 5:00 pm (with polls scheduled to close at seven).  They were certainly in a tizzy, as they had just been told that we had NOT been transmitting votes, wirelessly, all day.  uh-oh.  Somebody had “forgotten to turn on the mi-fi”, though she swore she had.  The ladies seemed to find this amusing.  I did not;  nor did the young tech-guys.   And I am left to wonder, what happened with the votes before that time?  I don’t know.  I don’t know if, immediately after the mifi was turned on, a cumulative total was sent to the man office, or not.  I do know that the laptop computer was taken to the CD-25 meeting place (or I hope it was), by the Dem judge.  And so, who really knows where this, “Mitt Romney swept Texas by 72%”, number even came from?

In my opinion, that number came from the 72 percent of voters who went with PAUL.  I won’t be convinced otherwise.

If you are unaware, thusfar, regarding what’s transpired in Clark County, Nevada, here’s the skinny:Ron Paul delegates, once again, TOOK IT HOME.  The State’s GOP has accepted this.  It is, after all, the voice of the people who cared enough to be delegates that voted-in Paul as their nominee. And, Vegas, via or along with the RNC (Reince Priebus) has decided to simply NOT accept this.  The RNC chairman;  Reince Priebus (sp?- who cares?), and did decide to break rule-11, at least in it’s theory.  They may not have specifically broken Rule-11, as such rule(s) apply to the State Offices of GOP, but in its practice, they did.

So, to make it clear to ALL, Clark County (CCRP) has passed a RESOLUTION to Rule-11a, and this is it:

RNC Rule 11(a) Resolution

WHEREAS Republican National Committee (RNC) Rule 11(a) states that “The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from the state involved, contribute money or inkind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office…”; and

WHEREAS the clear intent of Rule 11(a) is to ensure a fair, unbiased process for determining which candidates will receive the endorsement and support of the RNC during general elections; and

WHEREAS multiple viable candidates are still actively campaigning for the Republican Nomination for President of the United States; and

WHEREAS the Republican Nominee for President of the United States will not be selected until the Republican National Convention in late August, 2012; and

WHEREAS RNC Chairman Reince Priebus announced on April 25, 2012 that the RNC had selected Willard ‘Mitt’ Romney as the RNC’s “presumptive nominee” and that the RNC would be merging with the Romney campaign; and

WHEREAS the RNC has subsequently begun providing the Romney campaign with significant financial resources and manpower, assisting it with organization and fundraising; and

WHEREAS these acts by RNC Chairman Reince Priebus and the RNC Executive Committee constitute multiple flagrant violations of RNC Rule 11(a);


1. The Clark County Republican Party hereby condemns the actions of RNC Chairman Reince Priebus and the RNC Executive Committee, and demands that Mr. Priebus resign as Chairman immediately for his rolein these egregious violations of RNC Rules,

2. The Clark County Republican Party hereby declares that so long as more than one candidate is actively campaigning for the Republican Nomination for President of the United States, the Clark County Republican Party will reject any and all attempts by the RNC or any other organization to pressure or coerce the Clark County Republican Party into supporting or coordinating with any one specific candidate,

3. The Communications Director of the CCRP shall issue the attached national press release pertaining to this matter within 24 hours, and the Secretary of the CCRP shall transmit electronic or written copies of both this resolution and the above referenced press release to the RNC Executive Committee, The Nevada Republican Party Executive Committee, the executive body of each county Republican Party within the State of Nevada, and the entire membership of the Clark County Republican Central Committee within 5 days of acceptance. Additionally, a copy of this resolution and the attached press release shall be displayed prominently on the home page of the website for a minimum of 30 days.

Clark County Republican Party May 15, 2012


Now, what will this mean?  I understand that the Nevade State GOP is attempting to stop this “shadow party” (scum of the earth old-party GOP mainstay(s)) from continuing on, to prevent them from giving ANY sort of assistance to the Romney campaign, which it seems they have already DONE.  I know, in other states, such as Maine, and perhaps Nevada, they have tampered with and/or falsified Delegate Slates, in order to split the Paul votes, so that Romney could and would take a majority of votes. And I do believe that this in-kind collusion with the Romney campaign is also against the gist of Rule-11.   Well, the Paul-ites (or, Ronulans, to quote Doug Wead) were too smart for this one-sided “official” ballot and Paul DID take a great majority of delegates from Nevada, which will be seated in Tampa.  There were, I believe, some Romney delegates that made it to their final slate, but the RNC and some states’ GOP are not satisfied with pluralities of votes;  they want them ALL, so this latest resolution HAD to be done in order to stop them. Where does this guy, Reince Priebus, get off either completely breaking OR changing this rule;  mid-game?  How do these folk in the Republican National Caucus/Convention think they have any right to dismiss ANY delegates, and not just Paul delegates?  This melding of campaign monies with RNC monies (or GOP_Nevada monies,  the other way around) is breaking this specific rule, and it’s simply disgusting.  Yet, these RNC folk call US, “animals”, and say WE are not qualified or credentialed to be seated in our own states and ultimately at the national convention floor,  in Tampa (August).  ** Yes, these are the same folk who actually resorted to physical VIOLENCE when they did not get their way on votes!!  HOW insane ARE THEY?  And, of course:  Who are they ??  How do they think it’s okay for them to silence us and dismiss OUR votes, merely due to the fact that they don’t like the way the votes went?  They did not get their way, after all of the dirty-convention tricks, so this is what they do?

And from my comprhension of the Party’s rules and Election Laws, it’s not just RULES they have now broken, either.  They have now, officially, broken ELECTION LAWS as such laws pertain to campaign funds and contributions.  And they somwhow THINK they are right?  In a word, they are, WRONG.  And, they shall pay for this, too!

“Meanwhile in Nevada and other states, the RNC and/or GOP are working tirelessly and endlessly and repeatedly toward their OWN demise”.

Are they crazy, or. is “the party” SUICIDAL?  They need US more than WE need them, especially now!  Speaking of who needs whom;  the Jesse Benton emails did NOT say all of what’s being reported.  Benton (and Paul) have never stated they would support Romney.  Neither has said the good doctor is out, either, because he is NOT OUT!  Yes, Benton DID say he believed that Romney will be the party’s choice in Tampa, but Ron PAUL said that we ARE taking this to Tampa and HE plans on leading all of his delegates there.  Do these words sound like the words of a man who’s dropped out?  Please, before you all speak regarding these emails;  READ THEM.  And, do not bother with the lying msm (whether paper, tele, or online), okay?  DO NOT pass on their rumors and lies to ANYONE.

And one final thing;  this last moneybomb fell short, and i am sure this has everything to do with the emails from Benton, as well as the false reporting on said emails, via the most ridiculosly LYING (s)Newzz folk in the WORLD/  Please do donate, NOW, to the Paul campaign  As, and I’ve said it before, what price, LIBERTY?  Donate NOW!  As Always;  DO NOT BELIEVE THE MSM AS THEY ARE GETTING MANY OF YOU IN A TIZZY AND have gotten SOME (mamby_pamby) SUPPORTERS TO DROP OUT. DO NOT BE THEM!  CARE ABOUT THIS COUNTRY AND STAND UP WITH RON PAUL!


AND from ONE Paul delegate in Clark County;  the MITT and RNC/GOP of Nevada State Convention: cheating ballot.  THIS IS NOT an “offical ballot”, though they have clearly stated it is!  Yes, this IS one way they CHEAT!!Image

Rule #11a states:

(a) The Republican National Committee shall not, without the prior written and filed approval of all members of the Republican National Committee from
13 of 41
the state involved, contribute money or in-kind aid to any candidate for any public or party office except the nominee of the Republican Party or a candidate who is unopposed in the Republican primary after the filing deadline for that office. In those states where state law establishes a nonpartisan primary in which Republican candidates could participate, but in which the general election may not include a Republican candidate, the candidate endorsed by a convention held under the authority of the state Republican Party shall be recognized by the Republican National Committee as the Republican nominee


As I comprehend Rule #11, and as it applies to each state’s runs and ultimate vote(s) on the national convention floor:

Many people believe Rule #11 will simply remove Romney from the NATIONAL ELECTION process, but as the rule applies to the STATES, per state, I do think this is not the case.  Yes, all is not lost.  In fact, Mitt Romney SHOULD be removed from some state’s ballots, immediately, and this is why:

I studied up on rule-11, as written for each state’s delegation. and, where i see the main difference between what happened and what people believe will NOW happen is this:.  Most think Mitt R should drop out or be removed, NATIONALLY, and based on Rule#11, BUT as I see it, Rule #11 would remove him, one state at a time.  We should immediately begin with removing his name from the (national) ballot in the state of Maine, as well as in Nevada…

Rule-11 pertains to the STATE conventions and the STATE delegations’ votes on the national convention floor. IF a candidate conspires to commit FRAUD along with the State’s GOP, as we saw in Maine and Nevada (and probably Iowa and Missouri and other states), said candidate cannot BE on that state’s ballot. Well, people who were employed BY Romney’s STATE campaign offices, at least in Nevada and Maine, did work WITH each state’s GOP OFFICE, to produce and pass-out fraudulent slates (of Ron Paul supporters) in order to split the Ron Paul vote, hence insuring a win for Romney. It didn’t work, but here is where we NEED to implement Rule-11… We do have plenty of proof of this fraud, at the state level (thanks to delegates for Paul- Ginger in Maine, as well as certain Nevada Ron Paul delegates), and we need to USE this proof!

Why is this important?
In Nevada, where delegates are *sort of* bound, the Ron Paul delegates did promise to vote, first round, for Romney (as he supposedly won that ridiculous beauty-pageant– again, most likely fraudulently).. However, IF Rule-11 is applied to remove Mitt from their state’s ballot, when it comes to the NATIONAL delegation from Nevada as well as Maine, Romney should NOT even be an option. The good folk of both states should not have a chance to even VOTE FOR Romney when it comes to the NATIONAL CONVENTION vote. And, these (STATE GOP AND STATE ROMNEY DELEGATES) people are planning on playing this same fraudulent game in Oklahoma, today!!
I think we need to get the Ron Paul campaign, as well as delegates for Paul,  to file exceptions within Maine AND Nevada, to remove Mitt from both State’s BALLOTS. Yes, their conventions (state level) are over, but the people voted-in to represent the state are still going to vote in Tampa. Romney should NOT even be a choice, as he and his campaign, in collusion with the states’ party officials, has ruled himself OUT.
And, this needs to be taken on IMMEDIATELY, before the usuals in the RNC decide to, again, simply remove Ron Paul delegates from their states’ delegations. Yes, they are working toward this end.

Please do NOT forget, as your state is holding their conventions AND “beauty pageants”:  videotape ALL votes, for Paul, for USA, for HONESTY.


This should go with my lower (earlier) post, to PROVE that Ron Paul IS WINNING, regardless of (and sometimes BECAUSE OF) the MSM’s LIES and ignorance. let them IGNORE PAUL, as by doing so, they IGNORE US..and then? WE IGNORE THEM!

Please go and like this video on youtube, share in twitter, on the facebook, and here. MUCH appreciated! Isn’t it just GREAT when the fruits of OUR labors are so OUT THERE? To all who’ve worked so hard for LIBERTY, I thank you!

Great piece, again, by Ben Swann.

Now, what does this mean? Are the “libertarians” taking over the GOP? Or, is the GOP based on libertarian values? In my mind, the GOP was the most libertarian, before they were taken over by the Neo-Cons. Since the eighties, and the take-over (by some who really don’t even know what that has meant to their lives and their party), the party HAS lost her way. So, are these “new” Republicans cut from the OLD cloth, or, are they trying to change the party to what it never was meant to be?

In this video (the montage of video clips), the State-Chairwoman from Washington State tried to say, “If the Ron Paul campaign is (going to) TAKE OVER this meeting, they have to PAY the Insurance fees, as the GOP is not covering the Ron Paul campaign” (or essentially this). Problem? Ron Paul IS a Republican. Each and every delegate and want-to-be delegate HAS sworn a oath of affiliation with the Republican party, as has Ron Paul, so ANY Republican would be covered under ANY standard umbrella policy. Now, IF the Republican Party of Washington State did not pay these insurance fees, making the floor open to ANY and ALL Republican comers, who DID?
The only scenario I can see the insurance fees not covering the Ron Paul Republicans would be this: Mitt Romney campaign PAID the fees. Has Mitt’s campaign paid the fees? if so, we have MORE dirty-dealings (probably fraudulent, definitely scandalous) in the GOP. So, I would like to know, from the mouth of the State GOP of Washington State: DID MITT ROMNEY PAY THESE DUES OR FEES?
If not, this woman needs to sit down and zip it. If so, we need another investigation into malfeasance..
Personally, I believe the Romney campaign has NOT paid the insurance for this meeting. However, as this woman has been SO adament that the Ron Paul folk are not covered to run the meeting (as Delegate Chair(s)), I have to wonder what really is happening.

Anyone in Washington State ready to spill the beans on this? If so, let me know.. and, of course, TELL Ben Swann, of Reality-Check fame. I am sure Ben would investigate and run with this, whichever truth it is, and will post the final truth– like a REAL journalist.
You can contact Ben on Twitter: @Fox19BenSwann, or in youtube, @BenSwannRealityCheck.

Again, if anyone in Washington State knows more of this backstory, I’d love to hear it. If this woman was simply speaking out of turn, I’d like to hear HER apologize to ALL GOP members, especially any and all DELEGATES, which seem to have gone the way of, Ron Paul!


So, here is is upon us, again;  Earth Day 2012, and what goes better with saving the earth than Ron Paul?

Hey;  who reading this does NOT recycle their cans and bottles?  Have any of you ever sold cans at the local recycling company?  I have, and it’s like FREE CASH!  I have bags of soda-water cans, that I knew I would some day remember to take to the recycling plant, to cash in on free gas-money, but have a BETTER plan now!

The Ron Paul Campaign NEEDS you.  What can you do that will only take a bit of time, an extra trash-can *or bags*, and truly minimal effort?  Separate and COLLECT all of your aluminum cans.  If you’re in one of the better states where you actually get a nickel per can, sell your cans.  If you are somewhere, like Texas, where cans are not worth a nickel, they are still worth something.  Gather those cans.  Send your kids out, nights before recycling morning, and get them to collect ALL empty soda or beer cans.  Take them to your recycling plant, put them on fhe scale, and VIOLA! Free money you can use to donate to the Ron Paul 2012 campaign!

Now, how hard was that?  And, it really cost YOU nothing!

** remember, in states, like Connecticut, New York, where you get a nickel (or so) per pop can, do NOT crush your cans. They prefer them whole.  In Texas and other states, where we are paid for these metals by the pound, crush them, and bag them.  Why not give the kids a FUN chore- stomping cans for Ron Paul? Or, if you need to take out some frustrations, do it yourself!

ImageMake it a really COOL Earth Day, this year!

SO MUCH Support for RON PAUL, People Were Up in Trees to GLIMPSE HIM!

There’s not a lot more to say about this wonderful happening, this event, in California. People were so excited to see Ron Paul, when they could not get into the stadium to hear and see him, they climbed the trees for a chance to catch a glimpse of the man.
Now, most don’t even bother showing up for a seat at a NewtSantoRomney stump. When the few who DO show for them arrive, they are handed so-called “homemade” signs, as nobody shows with signs of their own supporting any of these establishment TOOLS/ I think most of us Paul supporters have our own signs, and we carry them with us.
Which of the other candidates, Obama included, can say people are so excited to see them, they would climb trees? Oh, none of them.
And, did Obama draw this size crowd during his ’08 run? No he did not. and expect fewer this year, too. NDAA SOPA NDRP PIPA= hey Obama- WTF?

This man is simply my favorite Ron Paul supporter–and delegate– Derrick Grayson. I hope you will take time to hear him, heed his message, and vote correctly- for US, for America, for Liberty!
Check out TmotofGA on youtube and twitter. If his words don’t get you moving in the right direction, I don’t know what would!
As Tmot would say; “Boots On The Ground!”, for Ron Paul!

Submitted by Annebeck58 on Sun, 03/04/2012 – 


Okay, y’all. I am about to say some things that some may not exactly like, and may offend some, but here goes. I feel it’s necessary:

Ron Paul (supposedly) LOST WA STATE (??) to Baine Cap’s Mitt Romney. Whatttt? We are supposed to, again, simply swallow that tripe. Sorry, but I cannot. I watched so many videos and read SO many articles, even within MSM & prior to the vote, to tell me that is/ was impossible- that Paul was WINNING. I do have to say I am more than just disappointed. No, I am not disappointed in Ron Paul and the Ron Paul team. I AM disappointed in the Ron Paul SUPPORTERS, the voters, who just neglected to watch these votes; who basically allowed “them” to get away with this; in yet another state. This was obvious, to me, in Iowa, Maine, Nevada, Colorado, etc.., and now? Washington State? Impossible!

No, I don’t want to call (specific) people out… No, I don’t want to say, “if only you did this-or-that”, like if ONLY you had gotten others to come to the polls with you to vote Paul, he would have WON. No, I am completely frustrated that those in WA State simply seem to be willing to sit back (or bend-over) and accept defeat, so easily.
I have BEGGED you guys to PLEASE bring cameras to YOUR precincts, to video-tape the actual COUNTS , and yes; it is a LEGAL and LEGITIMATE thing to do. Nothing in anyone’s bylaws prevents people doing exactly this. But, when it came down to what I do feel is yet another fraudulent count (and yes; I came across a WA state voter last night, here, who said he was SURE vote-fraud had occured in HIS precinct), nobody did anything.

What will it take? How can I convince you to OPEN your IPhones or take another sort of video camera WITH YOU? It is YOUR right to do this. Nobody can tell you that you;re NOT allowed to do this, yet you don’t do it? WHY ARE YOU THERE, if not to get the truth and pass it on to US.USA? Okay, so you’re there to vote. But, do you want your vote to be counted, accurately, or are you willing to allow “them” (i.e., suicidal GOP) to switch out your vote for prepared Romney or Santorum votes? it seems the latter IS the case.

Please watch this video by a wonderful Hawaiian fan of Ron Paul:

Consider what he’s said. Consider what I am asking of you. Please, when your state votes or caucuses, DO videotape whatever does happen in your area or your county or your precinct. If enough of US do this, and we let them KNOW we are doing so (by posting these videos, everywhere, and sharing them, MORE places than NOT), they will think twice about being so blatant with said vote-fraud.
Otherwise, prepare yourselves for four more years of Obama (O-Bot, Bambi, O-Bomb-Ya). Personally, I don’t think I can stand that.
And, while I am chomping at the bit for MY chance to vote and to videotape the votes, in TEXAS, y’all are being a bit too complacent. Aren’t you?